Sin casa, otra vez: la Cañada Real frente a la exclusión habitacional
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se estima que en la Comunidad de Madrid siguen viviendo mas de 9000 personas en nucleos chabolistas. El objetivo del trabajo es visibilizar la situacion de exclusion habitacional de los asentamientos auto-producidos, y mas concretamente el de la Canada Real Galiana. Para ello, se ha revisado la bibliografia existente sobre el contexto y el concepto de exclusion habitacional. A partir de este marco teorico se ha elaborado un marco analitico que se ha aplicado al caso de estudio de la Canada Real Galiana para finalmente extraer conclusiones. De las conclusiones extraidas, destacar que las medidas llevadas a cabo por las instituciones no ayudan a empoderar a los sujetos ni abordar las causas estructurales de la exclusion y que los afectados son los que mas luchan por cubrir sus necesidades basicas y mejorar su calidad de vida, pese a que sus esfuerzos no son reco-nocidos e incluso son sistematicamente amenazados por politicas de acoso y derribo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".