MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W279699733

Brunei and Malaysia Resolve Outstanding Maritime Boundary Issues

2010· article· en· W279699733 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaritime boundaryBoundary (topology)FrontierGeographyTransit (satellite)Political scienceEconomyLawArchaeologyInternational lawEconomicsPublic transport
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The March 2009 boundary and territory agreement between Brunei and Malaysia is reviewed. The agreement, in the form of an exchange of letters, has not been expressly made public. However, the governments of the two states have disclosed sufficient information to assess the agreement, intended to resolve four matters: (i) the settling of maritime boundaries between Brunei and Malaysia; (ii) the establishment of a joint petroleum development area off Borneo known as a “Commercial Arrangement Area”; (iii) the initiation of a frontier survey to define the boundaries of Malaysia’s Limbang district nearly enclaved between Brunei’s two separate land areas; and (iv) the resolution of transit rights for the nationals of both states through inshore maritime areas. The history of maritime claims in the area is reviewed and the prospects for continuing seabed development considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it