MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797210147 · doi:10.7939/r37w67d11

Two Roads Diverged in a Wood: The Story of Caring Theorist Sister M. Simone Roach

2013· article· en· W2797210147 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTheological Perspectives and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSisterPhilosophySociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study introduces the Canadian nursing theorist, Sister Marie Simone Roach. It begins with Roach as the child Eileen, in her large Cape Breton Roman Catholic family and Gaelic culture, and continues as she finishes school, attends St. Joseph's Hospital School of Nursing in Glace Bay, and comes to know the school leaders, the Sisters of Saint Martha. It continues as she enters the Congregation of the Sisters of Saint Martha one year after graduating from nursing school. Predominantly, this study focuses on the professional life of Roach, and the development of her theory, The Human Act of Caring. It focuses on her work as a nursing educator, her role in the development of the first Code of Ethics for Nurses in Canada, and other significant sociological, geographical, religious, nursing/medical, and world events that became a context in which she lived and worked. It attempts to clarify how her nursing theory became so well known in the United States while it was largely overlooked in Canada over the more than two decades that caring theory was introduced and furthered in the nursing profession. Sister Roach was interviewed extensively, and her fonds were accessed for documents dating back to the 1950s. Nineteen interviews were conducted with individuals known to Roach, and other documents were accessed from archives, libraries, newspapers, journals, websites, and nursing organizations. Of special interest is the depth to which her theory has been developed, and how she has brought together aspects of relational ethics, spirituality, and components of caring to inform nursing practice, education and research, and the sheer value of this theory to present and future nurses. Coming to understand the complexity of her work, and her commitment to humanity helped to shed light on aspects of Sister Roach as a person. Likewise, learning of her background, the values to which her family and community subscribed, and the significant influences to which she was exposed, helps to understand Sister Roach the professional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it