MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797227892 · doi:10.1109/taes.2018.2826230

TDOA Estimation With Compressive Sensing Measurements and Hadamard Matrix

2018· article· en· W2797227892 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaRoyal Military College of CanadaCanadian Apheresis Group
FundersDefence Research and Development Canada
KeywordsMultilaterationCompressed sensingHadamard transformMatrix (chemical analysis)FDOAComputer scienceSignal reconstructionAlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)Property (philosophy)AcousticsSignal processingMathematicsTelecommunicationsPhysicsMaterials scienceMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper employs a special property of the Hadamard matrix to develop a novel compressive sensing (CS) based framework that eliminates the complex reconstruction step required by standard CS methods. In particular, time-difference-of-arrivals (TDOAs) of a signal at different receivers involved in positioning of unknown sources are directly estimated from CS measurements, without any attempt to reconstruct the full signals. Although this approach is designed for TDOA estimation, it is also capable of accommodating other CS applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it