Effect of Polyolefin Film and Light Transition Film on the Growth of Lettuce
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, effects of polyolefin(PO) film and light transition film on the growth of lettuce were investigated compared with ethylene-vinylacetate (EVA, antifogging, no drops and longevity type) film covering. Results showed that the temperature and humidity in greenhouse covered with PO film and light transition film were significantly increased. The average temperature in the greenhouse was 4 oC higher than outdoor temperature. The average illumination intensity in the greenhouse covered with PO film was 293.22 umol m-2 s-1, light transmittance was 80.37%, the average illumination intensity in the greenhouse covered with EVA film was 193.04 umol m-2 s-1, light transmittance was 52.91%. Compared with the common film, light transmittance of the PO film was significantly increased. Light transition film increased the chlorophyll content of lettuce by changing the element of the sunlight and increased production of vegetables. PO film and light transition film display a good application prospective in the production of vegetables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".