MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797527544 · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2018.2824327

Seven-Point Checklist and Skin Lesion Classification Using Multitask Multimodal Neural Nets

2018· article· en· W2797527544 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceChecklistArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkPoint (geometry)Pattern recognition (psychology)LesionMedicinePathologyPsychologyCognitive psychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a multi-task deep convolutional neural network, trained on multi-modal data (clinical and dermoscopic images, and patient meta-data), to classify the 7-point melanoma checklist criteria and perform skin lesion diagnosis. Our neural network is trained using several multi-task loss functions, where each loss considers different combinations of the input modalities, which allows our model to be robust to missing data at inference time. Our final model classifies the 7-point checklist and skin condition diagnosis, produces multi-modal feature vectors suitable for image retrieval, and localizes clinically discriminant regions. We benchmark our approach using 1011 lesion cases, and report comprehensive results over all 7-point criteria and diagnosis. We also make our dataset (images and metadata) publicly available online at http://derm.cs.sfu.ca.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it