Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: to assess the efficiency and tolerability of cerebrolysin in patients with epilepsy.Materials and methods. Sixty six epileptic patients with low Montreal Cognitive Assessment results (less than 26 scores) were studied. The examination included neurologic examination, routine electroencephalography and/or video-electroencephalography monitoring, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, assessment of clinical and biochemical blood tests. Criteria for exclusion were processual brain damage and noncompliance. All patients were assigned cerebrolysin 10 ml intravenous, an assessment of seizures frequency and cognitive functions was performed 1 and 3 months after the 1st visit. All the procedures of the study were performed by 38 patients out of 66.Results. In a group of patients with Alzheimer’s dementia there was a statistically insignificant tendency to decrease the final score over time (obviously associated with the progression of the disease); in the group of patients with brain damage the results of testing were improved, presumably related to the processes of neuroplasticity induced by cerebrolysin.Conclusion. Our results suggest that cerebrolysin is well tolerated and does not increase the frequency of epileptic seizures in patients with stable epilepsy (with no risk of developing status epilepticus) and cognitive disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".