MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797570978 · doi:10.1016/j.bjan.2017.04.016

Intubação seletiva do brônquio principal esquerdo em unidade de terapia intensiva neonatal

2018· article· pt· W2797570978 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony M.‐H. Ho, Michael P. Flavin, Melinda Fleming, Glenio B. Mizubuti

Bibliographic record

VenueBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicAirway Management and Intubation Techniques
Canadian institutionsKingston General HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntubationEndotracheal tubeBronchusEndotracheal intubationLumen (anatomy)AnesthesiaLungSurgeryRespiratory diseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A intubação seletiva neonatal do brônquio principal esquerdo para tratar a doença pulmonar direita é tipicamente feita com elaboradas manobras, instrumentação e dispositivos. Isso é frequentemente atribuído à geometria brônquica que favorece a entrada principal direita de um tubo endotraqueal (TET) deliberadamente avançado para além da carina. Recém‐nascido com enfisema bolhoso grave que afetava o pulmão direito e precisou com urgência da não ventilação desse pulmão. Para conseguir a intubação brônquica esquerda fizemos uma rotação de 180° do TET, de forma que o olho de Murphy ficasse voltado para a esquerda, e não para a direita, e para simular uma intubação à esquerda orientamos ligeiramente o TET, de modo que sua concavidade virasse para a esquerda em vez de para a direita, como em uma intubação convencional à direita. A intubação urgente do brônquio principal esquerdo com um TET pode ser facilmente obtida se reconhecermos que é a posição da ponta do TET e a direção de sua concavidade que determinam para qual brônquio o TET irá quando avançado. Isso é importante em neonatos criticamente doentes diante da margem de segurança e janela de tempo pequenas e na ausência de tubos de duplo lúmen. O uso de broncofibroscópio e bloqueadores deve ser considerado como planos de segurança. Selective neonatal left mainstem bronchial intubation to treat right lung disease is typically achieved with elaborate maneuvers, instrumentation and devices. This is often attributed to bronchial geometry which favors right mainstem entry of an endotracheal tube deliberately advanced beyond the carina. A neonate with severe bullous emphysema affecting the right lung required urgent non‐ventilation of that lung. We achieved left mainstem bronchial intubation by turning the endotracheal tube 180° such that the Murphy's eye faced the left instead of the right, and simulated a left‐handed intubation by slightly orientating the endotracheal tube such that its concavity faced the left instead of the right as in a conventional right‐handed intubation. Urgent intubation of the left mainstem bronchus with an endotracheal tube can be easily achieved by recognizing that it is the position of the endotracheal tube tip and the direction of its concavity that are the chief determinants of which bronchus an endotracheal tube goes when advanced. This is important in critically ill neonates as the margin of safety and time window are small, and the absence of double‐lumen tubes. Use of fiberoptic bronchoscope and blockers should be reserved as backup plans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrazilian Journal of AnesthesiologySame topicAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207