MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797590128 · doi:10.7939/r3sq8qv3m

Negotiating identities: A narrative inquiry into the experiences of people living with HIV in Kenya.

2015· article· en· W2797590128 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geoffrey Maina

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNegotiationNarrativeHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Narrative inquiryQualitative researchSociologyGender studiesIdentity (music)Political scienceMedicineSocial scienceVirologyAestheticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper-based dissertation is a culmination of my personal journey of inquiring into the experiences of people living with HIV (PHAs), a curiosity that began as a Registered Nurse caring for dying clients who were HIV positive at a hospital in Kenya in 2003. At the time, witnessing PHAs die in large numbers, due to the unavailability of life-saving medications was heartbreaking. In my work as a Registered Nurse, I cared for Solomon, whose HIV story, though silenced, was atypical compared to the stories of other PHAs on the unit I worked. As a patient who exhibited affluence and considerable socioeconomic capital based on the number and nature of visitors he attracted to his bedside, I had many wonders about who he was. Furthermore, by asking us to conceal his HIV status from his family, I became more intrigued to what I perceived to be a paradoxical life. Intrigued by the silences, paradoxes, and complexities in Solomon’s experiences as a PHA, I embarked on a journey to Canada to pursue doctoral studies in nursing. This followed an invitation by Dr. Judy Mill and Dr. Vera Caine to join a national CIHR-funded project called A Clinical Mentorship of Canadian Nurses in HIV Care. My involvement in this project as a research assistant greatly enhanced my understanding of ways to engage PHAs’ experiential knowledge in HIV education, research, and care in line with the Greater Involvement of People living with HIV/AIDS (GIPA) principles. After 3 years of doctoral studies in Canada, I returned to Kenya to carry out doctoral fieldwork, aware that the availability of antiretroviral medications in Kenya has significantly changed the HIV landscape. HIV infection was no longer fatal. Instead, it is now being treated as a chronic illness. This narrative inquiry study was based at Utumishi , an AIDS Service Organization (ASO) that provides care and support to PHAs in western Kenya. Luanda, Atoti, Nelly, and Estero, who became part of this study, continue to be both clients and HIV lay workers at the ASO. In inquiring into experiences of living with HIV, the social, political, economic, and personal implications of living with HIV became explicit. The participants’ narrative accounts, composed from informal and formal conversations, reflections and field notes, were negotiated with the four participants. To honor their stories, these narrative accounts became dissertation chapters. The moral and ethical implications of engaging in narrative inquiry become even more explicit to me with the evolution of my positioning as a researcher. At the start of the research, I let the research puzzle dictate my engagement with participants. With time, as the participants increasingly became involved in the inquiry, I began to shift and see my participants as co-researchers. This shift was occasioned by my willingness to be flexible and to travel to participants’ worlds in order to attend to their experiences differently. Through a sustained relational commitment to the inquiry, I comprehended how political and social discourses that story HIV as a chronic illness shape the experiences of people living with HIV. Bury’s (1982) concept of illness as a biographical disruption, which has been used to describe the social process of experiencing an illness, could not fully account for the experiences that participants lived. Further, in attending to experiences of living with HIV as HIV lay workers, I explored how the GIPA principles are taken up in a donor-funded ASO. In utilizing Lindermann-Nelson’s (1995) concept of found and chosen communities, complexities of paid and unpaid HIV work were realized. In the last chapter of this dissertation, I take a turn to consider the significance of this research and what it contributes to the body of knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesFrench-language works237,207