Unusual Photooxidation of S-Bonded Mercaptopyridine in a Mixed Ligand Ruthenium(II) Complex with Terpyridine and Bipyridine Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An unusual photooxidation of a coordinated 4-mercaptopyridine (SpyH) ligand in the [Ru(Hmctpy)(dmbpy)(κS-SpyH)]2+complex (Hmctpy = 4′-carboxy-2,2′;6′,2″-terpyridine, dmbpy = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine) takes place under visible and UV irradiation, in aerated acetonitrile. The [Ru(mctpy)(dmbpy)(κS-SO2py)] sulfinato product has been characterized by a variety of methods, including X-ray diffraction which supports the presence of the Ru-κS-SpyH isomer in the starting complex. The photooxidation of the 4-mercaptopyridine ligand enhances the back-bonding interactions in the complex by means of the strongly acceptor 4-pyridinesulfinato-SO2py species, increasing the redox potential of the Ru(III)/Ru(II) couple significantly from 1.23 to 1.62 V. It also led to pronounced changes in the electronic and NMR spectra of the complexes, corroborated by DFT and ZINDO-S calculations. A possible mechanism based on referenced data of photooxidation has been proposed, which involves the formation of a reactive oxygen species and intermediate endoperoxide species, yielding a very stable Ru-sulfinato product. This novel species exhibits stronger luminescence (Φf = 0.004) than the starting complex under UV excitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".