MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797651085

Proceedings of the seventh ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications

2002· article· en· W2797651085 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceSalt lakeComputer scienceOperations researchEngineeringGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Solid Modeling Symposium series is an international forum for the exchange of recent research and applications of solid modeling, shape modeling, and geometric computation in design, analysis and manufacturing, as well as in emerging biomedical, geophysical and other areas. Previous symposia in this series were held in Austin, Texas, 1991; Montreal, Canada, 1993; Salt Lake City, Utah, 1995; Atlanta, Georgia, 1997; and Ann Arbor, Michigan in 1999 and 2001. These brought together prominent researchers, practitioners, and numerous students in the field.The Seventh ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications was held at the Max-Planck-Institut fur Infomatik, in Saarbrucken, Germany, on June 17-21, 2002. Starting in 2002, the Symposium is expected to be held annually, alternating in location between the USA and other countries with a two year period. Pre-symposium activities included short courses and tutorials held on the two days preceding the plenary sessions. We thank ACM SIGGRAPH and Eurographics for sponsoring the symposium, and the Max-Planck-Institut fur Infomatik for organizing the symposium this year. In particular, we thank Hans-Peter Seidel and Vadim Shapiro for their work as general co-chairs of the symposium. We also thank Jens Vorsatz for developing and maintaining the web site of the symposium http://www.mpi-sb.mpg.de/conferences/sm02/ and Sabine Budde, conference secretary, for assisting in the conference organization.Ninety three papers were submitted to the symposium. All papers were assigned to a member of the program committee by the program co-chairs. Each paper was reviewed by the program committee member and, in general, at least three reviewers selected by the program commitee member. Based on the recommendations of the program committee members and the reviewers, the program co-chairs made the final selections of the papers and posters. We thank all the members of the program committee and reviewers for their expert assistance in this selection process. The final program of the symposium consists of 9 refereed paper sessions with 26 paper presentations and a poster session with 17 posters. There are also 3 invited papers. These proceedings contain the 43 refereed papers and the abstracts of the three invited papers. Unfortunately, as is the case in conferences where many papers are submitted and only a small number can be accepted, some good papers could not be accepted. We thank all the authors of all papers for their contributions to the success of this symposium. The topics of the papers range from fundamental issues on the representation and manipulation of solid models to applications of solid modeling in various fields. Altogether, the papers present many interesting solutions to current problems in solid modeling, as well as valuable insights for future work in this area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207