Three-dimensional stability of compound slope using limit analysis method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates three-dimensional (3D) stability of a compound soil slope with two inclination angles using the limit analysis method. The current limit analysis involves the toe-failure, face-failure, and base-failure mechanisms of the slope, all of which are possible 3D failure mechanisms. By reducing the current compound slope to a simple slope, the validity and efficiency of the present analysis are examined by comparing the current results with published solutions. The 3D stability of a compound soil slope is studied schematically for a wide range of parameters, and the stability charts are presented. The effects of slope shape (i.e., concave and convex shapes) and depth coefficient on the slope stability are investigated graphically. The graphs of critical failure surfaces are also presented to demonstrate the effects of slope shape and depth coefficient on the failure mechanism of a compound soil slope.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it