Rare red eggs of the Common Guillemot (<i>Uria aalge</i>): birds, biology and people at Bempton, Yorkshire, in the early 1900s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Huge numbers of Common Guillemot (Uria aalge) eggs were harvested by local men known as “climmers” (climbers) at Bempton Cliffs, Flamborough, Yorkshire, until 1954 when egg collecting became illegal. Guillemot eggs are more variable in colour and pattern than those of any other bird. Egg collectors (oologists) particularly favoured sets of unusually coloured eggs laid by the same bird. Red guillemots eggs were extremely rare and eagerly sought. An example of one such egg known as the “Bempton Belle” was found in the collection of J. W. Goodall (active between about 1896 and 1909), and was celebrated in a poem. What was probably another red egg, known as the “Metland Egg”, was collected each year at Bempton between 1912 and 1938. The current whereabouts of the Metland eggs is unknown. We estimate that females laying red eggs occur less than once in a thousand (or ten thousand). We also speculate about the factors responsible for red eggs and why such eggs are so rare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".