Model Pembelajaran Kolaborasi Meningkatkan Partisipasi Siswa,Keterampilan Sosial, dan Prestasi Belajar IPS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Model Pembelajaran Kolaborasi untuk Meningkatkan Partisipasi Siswa, Keterampilan Sosial, dan Prestasi Belajar IPS. Tujuan penelitian tindakan kelas ini adalah untuk meningkatkan (1) partisipasi siswa dalam pembelajaran IPS, (2) keterampilan sosial siswa, (3) prestasi belajar IPS, dan (4) respon positif siswa terhadap penerapan pembelajaran kolaborasi. Prosedur penelitian tindakan kelas terdiri atas tiga siklus, dan setiap siklus meliputi perencanaan, pelaksanaan, pengamatan, dan refleksi. Penelitian tindakan ini dilaksanakan di SMPN 2 Gresik, dengan subjek siswa kelas IXC berjumlah 32 orang terdiri atas 15 pria dan 17 wanita. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan pembelajaran kolaborasi dapat meningkatkan (1) partisipasi siswa dalam pembelajaran IPS, (2) keterampilan sosial siswa, (3) prestasi belajar IPS, dan (4) respon positif siswa terhadap model pembelajaran kolaborasi.Kata kunci: pembelajaran kolaborasi, partisipasi siswa, keterampilan sosial,prestasi belajar
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it