MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2797737629

Efeito da eletroanalgesia no controle da disestesia em mulheres submetidas a linfonodectomia axilar

2017· dissertation· en· W2797737629 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andreza Carvalho Rabelo Mendonça

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHealthcare during COVID-19 Pandemic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surgical treatment of breast cancer brings many complications such as dysesthesia at the intercostal nerve dermatome (NICB) due to manipulation of the axillary region. As a treatment for abnormal sensitivity, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) has been used in other neuropathic injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of TENS on dysesthesia caused by an injury in the NICB in women undergoing to axillary lymphadenectomy (LA). This is a placebo-controlled, randomized, double blind clinical trial in involved 32 women who underwent to LA and showed dysesthesia, 16 patients were randomly allocated to active TENS group and 16 in the other group placebo TENS. The instruments used to measure pain were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ-Br). Cutaneous and pressure pain threshold were assessed by using esthesiometry and pressure algometry, respectively. Current amplitude of the electrical pulse was recorded along the 20 sessions. The measurement of quality of life was performed by using the EORTC QLQ-C3O (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life), followed by its specific module EORTC QLQ-BR23. It was observed that the intensity of sensory discomfort decreased only in the group treated with active TENS when compared to placebo (p<0.06). There was a significant reduction of the pain index and the number of words chosen in the active TENS group when analyzing both paired and independent measurements (p=0.003 and p=0.05). The amplitude of the electric current significantly increased in the active TENS group (p<0.006). No differences were observed in cutaneous threshold, however, there was significant reduction in the pressure pain threshold in the placebo TENS group (p<0.001). Regarding to the quality of life, there was a significant decrease of the domain scores overall health of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in the placebo TENS group (p<0.022), with no significant differences for scores of EORTC QLQ-BR23. It is concluded that TENS reduced the intensity of discomfort in the NICB dermatome, and over time, it was possible to administer higher amplitude of current in the group of TENS active. However, no improvement was observed in the characterization of discomfort in the skin and pressure pain thresholds and quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicHealthcare during COVID-19 PandemicFrench-language works237,207