Induction of immunity following vaccination with a chemically attenuated malaria vaccine correlates with persistent antigenic stimulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objectives Blood stage malaria parasites attenuated with seco‐cyclopropyl pyrrolo indole (CPI) analogues induce robust immunity in mice to homologous and heterologous malaria parasites and are being considered for the development of a human vaccine. However, it is not understood how attenuated parasites induce immunity. We showed that following vaccination, parasite DNA persisted in blood for several months, raising the possibility that ongoing immune stimulation may be critical. However, parasites were not seen microscopically beyond 24 h postvaccination. We aimed to provide a mechanistic understanding of immune induction. Methods Mice were vaccinated with chemically attenuated Plasmodium chabaudi parasites. PCR and adoptive transfer studies were used to determine the presence of parasites and antigen in vivo. In other experiments, Plasmodium falciparum parasitised red blood cells were attenuated in vitro and RNA and antigen expression studied. Results We show that blood transferred from vaccinated mice into naïve mice activates T cells and induces complete protective immunity in the recipient mice strongly suggesting that there is persistence of parasite antigen postvaccination. This is supported by the presence of parasite RNA in vaccinated mice and both RNA and antigen expression in P. falciparum cultures treated with CPI drugs in vitro. In addition, drugs that block parasite growth also prevent the induction of immunity in vaccinated mice, indicating that some growth of attenuated parasites is required for immune induction. Conclusions Attenuated parasites persist at submicroscopic levels in the blood of mice postvaccination with the ability to activate T cells and induce ongoing protective immune responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".