MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-time power hardware-in-the-loop emulation of a parallel hybrid electric vehicle drive train

2017· article· en· W2798140463 on OpenAlexaff
R. Sudharshan Kaarthik, Pragasen Pillay

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference (ITEC-India) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHardware-in-the-loop simulationController (irrigation)TrainEmulationPower (physics)Computer scienceTorqueReal-time simulationDrivetrainMATLABEngineeringPowertrainEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the main challenges in the development of hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) is control and co-ordination of several power sources. Power electronic emulators for drive trains provide effective and economic ways to test and validate control strategies in real-time. This paper proposes a real-time emulator for parallel hybrid electric vehicles. The major mechanical and electrical parts of a typical parallel hybrid electric vehicle power-train (the engine drive train and the motor drive train) is modeled mathematically and is emulated in real-time using power hardware-in-the-loop (PHIL). The individual sub-systems are modeled and locally controlled to maintain the required performance and control modes such as speed and torque. Real-time simulation was done in Matlab-Simulink and DS-1103 real-time controller and the results are presented. Voltage source inverters are used as power amplifiers to emulate the characteristics of the individual drive trains. The voltage source inverters are controlled by the same DS-1103 controller in rapid control prototype (RCP) mode. Experimental results with power hardware-in-the-loop emulator is presented for the validation of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2017 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference (ITEC-India)Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207