MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W279829969

Flowers of Shanghai

2001· article· en· W279829969 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robin Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueCineaction! · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilm directorDozenMovie theaterArt historyArtHistoryMedia studiesSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flowers of Shanghai has been widely acclaimed as Hou Hsiao-Hsien's masterpiece to date; it appeared in the majority of critics' lists of the Ten Best Films of the '90s, frequently in top place; along with Hou's other dozen-or-so films, it has yet to be given a theatrical release in North America. Hou is widely regarded as the most important living filmmaker, but his films have been accessible only to those attending film festivals or in the retrospective of ten films that toured North America in recent years: accessible, that is, only to those living in a very few major cities. The big corporations that now dominate and effectively control our wider film culture are headed by tycoons who have evidently no interest in cinema but a great deal of interest in making more and more money. There are signs that some of them are now wondering whether Asian and Iranian films just might bring in enough customers to be worth bothering with. Kiarostami's The Wind Will Carry Us, Wong Kar-wai's In the Mood for Love and Edward Yang's Yi Yi have opened in Toronto and (to judge from their longish runs) appear to have had a limited success--sufficient, in fact, in the case of Yi Yi for an enterprising management to try out the film in a complex well outside the city centre. It seems not impossible that further (and wider) releases may follow. The situation is little better on video and DVD, distribution again being controlled, by and large, by the major corporations who also control the Hollywood studios: Why waste money on the rights when for every hundred who might be expected to buy a DVD of Pearl Harbour, only two would spend their money on Flowers of Shanghai? [1] It is, however, worth alerting readers to the partial (and only with effort accessible) availability of some of the major Asian films in cities that have extensive Chinatowns. In Asian video stores in Toronto I have managed to collect all the films to date (including In the Mood for Love) of Wong Kar-wai on excellent DVDs, complete with English subtitles. Unfortunately such stores appear dominated by Hong Kong companies, so Taiwanese films are not usually available, but Flowers of Shanghai is the exception. The DVD is of high quality, with Dolby sound, though the subtitles in this case are somewhat problematic, intermittently illegible when the bottom of the screen is brightly lit. The opening scene (an eight-minute take) suffers most, almost all the remainder of the film being set in rooms lit only by table lamps at some distance from the camera. I heard a rumour about a year ago that an enterprising American firm had acquired the rights to six of the films in the Hou travelling retrospective, but this has never been confirmed and so far nothing has come of it. One can always hope. Meanwhile, the pre-Yi Yi works of Yang and almost the entire output of Tsai Ming-Liang (Vive l'Amour is available on DVD, presumably on the strength of its title!) await proper distribution; the latter's other three films to date are all available on videos of less than first-rate (though serviceable) quality, in certain of those alternative video stores found in big cities. I have not been able to find any of Yang's earlier films anywhere in any format, though Yi Yi is now available on DVD in the States and is to be released in Canada in the fall. I should add that, in the event of some distributor deciding to try Hou out on the general public, I don't think Flowers of Shanghai would be the wisest first choice: It is a very difficult and demanding movie, the basic difficulty for Western audiences in identifying characters played by unfamiliar actors who all have dark hair, are clean-shaven, and roughly the same height, compounded by the film's extreme subtlety, its complex, elliptical and continuously shifting narrative, and its director's intransigent refusal to help the audience by making obvious points, spelling out meanings, telling us what to think of the characters, or carefully explaining their motivation (which is never simple and perhaps not always explicable in clumsy words). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCineaction!Same topicHong Kong and Taiwan PoliticsFrench-language works237,207