El tráfico norteamericano en Tenerife a finales del siglo XVIII a través de los informes consulares franceses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este articulo pretende hacer un estudio de la navegacion de Tenerofe a finales del siglo XVIII, en concreto durante las decadas de los 80 v 90 de esa centuria, centrado en uno de sus aspectos: los tratos que mantenia esta isla con Norteamerica. Para ello hemos manejado fundamentalmente las fuentes consulares francesas que hoy en dia se encuentran en los Archivos Nacionales Franceses. Es por eso que analizamos las entradas de embarcaciones de esta nacionalidad, comparandolas con las de otros Estados, cuales eran las mercancias que se traian y cuales las que se exportaba, su importancia como transportistas, los puertos con los que se comerciaba, el valor de las mercancias, la tipologia y el tonelaje de las naves, etc. En definitiva, la pretension de este articulo, es ayudar a un mejor conocimiento de unos de los principales mercados canarios a final del siglo XVIII: los Estados Unidos. In this article we have tried to study the navigation of the island of Tenerife at the end of the eighteenth century; to be precise during the decades of the eighties and nineties. We concentrate on the trade between this island and North America, including Canada, and especially with the United States, after its recent independence. With this aim, we have consulted the National French Archives, and the news of their consuls at the Canary Islands. For this reason we study the ships' arrivals, tonnage, typology, merchandise transported and their value, the role of their maritime calls, what were their exports, the ports with which they traded, and their importance as intermediaries with other regions. Finally, we want to have more knowledge about one of the principal Canarian markets at the end of the eighteenth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".