MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2798409800 · doi:10.1109/apec.2018.8341292

A mathematical guideline for designing an AC-DC LLC converter with PFC

2018· article· en· W2798409800 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltagePower (physics)Power factorGuidelineElectrical engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceElectronic engineeringScheme (mathematics)EngineeringControl theory (sociology)PhysicsMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although LLC topology has been applied to AC-DC power supplies as a Power Factor Correction (PFC) converter in the literature, there is no publications present intuitive equations that simplify LLC designing in order to meet the PFC gain requirements. In this paper, a mathematical design guideline is derived for LLC PFC converter applications, proving that by carefully designing the resonant tank gain at parallel resonant frequency at the peak AC voltage higher than 1, its gain will meet the PFC requirement for other AC voltages and result in a successful single-stage PFC design with power factor over 0.99. The guideline is extended to offline wide input and output voltage LLC PFC applications. A 240-Watt prototype of a single-stage LLC LED driver with PFC has been built to verify the feasibility of the proposed design guideline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207