MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2798429883

The French musicals: the dramatic impulse of Spectacle

2004· article· en· W2798429883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLatin American Theatre Review (The University of Kansas) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheater, Performance, and Music History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectacleMusicalEntertainmentOperaArtComedyMovie theaterGermanLiteratureVisual artsArt historyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The appellation increasingly applied to French musicals is spectacle. French musicals differ from their contemporary English and German language cousins in that their techniques and artistry come not predominantly from theatre, but from show business. In a culture that has been critically antagonistic to the musical genre over the past decades, les spectacles musicaux1 have nonetheless had extraordinary success in Europe and Canada. While the blockbuster musicals, globally produced, including Les Miserables (1985) and The Phantom of the Opera (1986), which seemed ubiquitous in the 1980s and early 90s, found no substantial audience base in France; at the turn of the century there is evidence of a substantial musical theatre originating in the French language. In this article, I focus on two of the most successful of the recent musicals, Notre-Dame de Paris (1998) and Romeo & Juliette (2000). Both are spectacles, as at home on the stage as on MTV, DVD, or CD. The term, spectacle, is itself applied to divergent styles and genres of entertainment. A close translation is simply “show.” The appellation is not in consistent use and the musical theatre described has also been referred to as operarock and comedie musicale, as rock opera and musical comedy are used in English. The English use of “spectacle” actually approximates spectacle, but is often used in specific reference to the mise en scene of blockbuster musicals, defined by the complexity and expense of sets and special effects. The emergence of les spectacles musicaux has defined a specific trend in French musical based largely on the tension between mise en scene and popular music. The majority of writing on theatrical musicals, and indeed on film musicals, has centred on America, particularly the “golden age” dominated by Richard Rodgers and Oscar Hammerstein II, excluding those European composers and lyricists who have had international success over the last three decades. Furthermore, from the late 1960s, rock music began to influence tangibly the theatrical musical with Jesus Christ Superstar (1970), Hair (1968), The Who’s Tommy (1969), and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it