MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2798536482 · doi:10.47925/2013.246

Reconciliation, Justice, and Indigenous Education

2013· article· en· W2798536482 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin McDonough

Bibliographic record

VenuePhilosophy of education · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousEconomic JusticeInclusion (mineral)SovereigntyState (computer science)Meaning (existential)Indigenous educationPoliticsGovernment (linguistics)Global justicePolitical scienceSociologySelf-determinationPublic administrationEnvironmental ethicsCriminologySocial scienceLawEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John Hopkins proposes to "examine critically the meaning of justice that implicitly informs the inclusive discourse characterizing IEFA."For Hopkins, the meaning of justice includes the aims of reconciliation and inclusion.The primary aim of my response will be to question and challenge this understanding of justice as it applies to Indigenous education. JUSTICE AND INCLUSIONAccording to Will Kymlicka, justice for minority national groups, including Indigenous peoples, is fundamentally a matter of addressing Indigenous demands for self-government and political sovereignty. 1 Here the demand for justice is a demand for separation from the nation-state rather than for inclusion within it; in other words, the desire of the minority national group is precisely to avoid greater integration and inclusion in the society of the majority nation-state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.044
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhilosophy of educationSame topicPolitical Philosophy and EthicsFrench-language works237,207