MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2798654840 · doi:10.3138/topia.27.197

The Importance of Remembering in Relation: Juxtaposing the Air India and <i>Komagata Maru</i> Disasters

2012· article· en· W2798654840 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Diaspora
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomelandNavyHistoryRelation (database)ImmigrationTerrorismLawSociologyPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1914, a ship named the Komagata Maru arrived off the coast of British Columbia carrying 376 would-be immigrants, mostly Sikh men from India desiring to settle permanently in the burgeoning colony of Canada. A public sentiment of concern about “Hindoo Invaders” and a discriminatory immigration policy caused the ship to be anchored for two months in the Vancouver harbour, during which time passengers were occasionally denied food and water. The ship was finally forced back to sea under threat from the weaponry of a Canadian navy vessel. At a first glance, this event seems to have little in common with the 1985 bombing of Air India Flight 182, a terrorist act commonly believed to have been committed by Sikh separatists fighting for an independent Khalistan, or Sikh homeland, in India. Yet in Anita Rau Badami’s novel Can You Hear The Nightbird Call? and Uma Parameswaran’s poem “On the Shores of the Irish Sea,” the Komagata Maru and Air India disasters are explicitly linked. In this paper, I explore the reasons these authors might want to encourage a wider public to remember these two events in relation. How might remembrance of one refract and reframe memories of the other? Ultimately, I turn to recent state-sponsored efforts to memorialize and offer reconciliation for the Air India and Komagata Maru atrocities to demonstrate how failing to remember these events in relation makes it is easier to cloak the overt racism underpinning both and to thus maintain the veneer of “Canada” as a haven for racial diversity. By contrast, if public memorials of one event were designed in such a way as to explicitly make links to the other, I argue, a wider public might come to recognize how the unresolved injustice of the Maru incident is deeply implicated in the cascading torrent of violent atrocities that contributed to the bombing of Air India Flight 182, a connection virtually impossible to draw from current state-sponsored efforts to memorialize either event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.908

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it