MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2798832016

Réversion du principe du logement humain – Chronique du prêt hypothécaire inversé

2009· article· fr· W2798832016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPIRE (Sciences Po) · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArts and Humanities Research CouncilGeorgetown UniversityEconomic and Social Research CouncilBoston College
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compte-rendu d'une étude sur la conception, l'émergence, le développement et l'usage des prêts hypothécaires inversés. Les auteurs proposent tout d'abord une analyse des 'reverse mortgages' à partir de l'exemple américain du programme de Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (HECM), puis commentent les évolutions possibles du marché de ces reverse mortgages. Ils effectuent ensuite un tour d'horizon de la diffusion des prêts viagers hypothécaires dans quelques pays anglo-saxons (Royaume-Uni, Canada, Australie, Nouvelle-Zélande) et au Japon. Ils examinent les problèmes que posent ces prêts pour le statut du logement familial (bien consommable, actif fongible, investissement convertible en créances susceptibles d'être titrisées sur des marchés financiers virtuels). Ils reviennent sur les débats autour de la relation entre hypothèque inversée et protection sociale et commentent enfin les enseignements tirés des diverses expériences menées dans les pays anglo-saxons. (résumé des auteurs)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it