MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799193842 · doi:10.1109/itc30.2018.10058

A General Per-Flow Service Curve for GPS

2018· preprint· en· W2799193842 on OpenAlexafffund
Almut Burchard, Jörg Liebeherr

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemGeneralized processor sharingAffine transformationScheduling (production processes)Computer scienceProcessor sharingConstant (computer programming)Network packetService (business)Variable (mathematics)Computer networkReal-time computingAlgorithmMathematicsMathematical optimizationQuality of serviceQueueTelecommunicationsDynamic priority schedulingRound-robin schedulingGeometryMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generalized Processor Sharing (GPS), which provides the theoretical underpinnings for fair packet scheduling algorithms, has been studied extensively. However, a tight formulation of the available service to a flow only exists for traffic that is regulated by affine arrival envelopes and a constant-rate link. In this paper, we show that the universal service curve by Parekh and Gallager can be extended to concave arrival envelopes and links with time-variable capacity. We also dispense with the previously existing assumption of a stable system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207