MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2799200053 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabe8e

A Thorough View of the Nuclear Region of NGC 253: Combined Herschel, SOFIA, and APEX Data Set

2018· article· en· W2799200053 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiative transferSpire (mollusc)Spectral lineOn boardGalaxySpectral energy distributionSpectral signaturePhotometry (optics)Line (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present a large set of spectral lines detected in the 40″ central region of the starburst galaxy NGC 253. Observations were obtained with the three instruments SPIRE, PACS, and HIFI on board the Herschel Space Observatory, upGREAT on board the SOFIA airborne observatory, and the ground-based Atacama Pathfinder EXperiment telescope. Combining the spectral and photometry products of SPIRE and PACS, we model the dust continuum spectral energy distribution (SED) and the most complete 12CO line SED reported so far toward the nuclear region of NGC 253. The properties and excitation of the molecular gas were derived from a three-component non-LTE radiative transfer model, using the SPIRE 13CO lines and ground-based observations of the lower-J 13CO and HCN lines, to constrain the model parameters. Three dust temperatures were identified from the continuum emission, and three components are needed to fit the full CO line SED. Only the third CO component (fitting mostly the HCN and PACS 12CO lines) is consistent with a shock-/mechanical-heating scenario. A hot core chemistry is also argued as a plausible scenario to explain the high-J 12CO lines detected with PACS. The effect of enhanced cosmic-ray ionization rates, however, cannot be ruled out and is expected to play a significant role in the diffuse and dense gas chemistry. This is supported by the detection of ionic species like OH+ and H2O+, as well as the enhanced fluxes of the OH lines with respect to those of H2O lines detected in both PACS and SPIRE spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→