MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799219940 · doi:10.1109/ieses.2018.8349874

Energy loss analysis of traction inverter drive for different PWM techniques and drive cycles

2018· article· en· W2799219940 on OpenAlexaff
Rishi Menon, Najath Abdul Azeez, Arvind H. Kadam, Sheldon S. Williamson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse-width modulationTraction (geology)InverterTraction motorAutomotive engineeringComputer scienceVoltage source inverterEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The critical components in electric vehicle (EV) propulsion system are the traction inverter and motor. For better performance of the EV, it is important to operate traction inverter/motor at optimal efficiency points over the entire drive cycle. The significant advances in pulse width modulation (PWM) techniques has helped to improve the efficiency of the traction drive. Hence this paper aims at the modeling of the traction inverter with different PWM techniques, over different city driving schedules and analyze the energy losses in the semiconductor devices. The paper presents the thermal model based analysis of DC/AC inverter considering the conduction and switching losses for both insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) and antiparallel diodes as a switch. An induction motor driving a medium-sized EV, has been modeled in the PLECS software. The energy loss calculation is carried out based on device characteristics. The losses are observed for both cold start and hot starts, based on the heat sink temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207