MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799291845 · doi:10.3138/cjfs.12.1.2

Bridgespotting: Lepage, Hitchcock, and Landmarks in Canadian Film

2003· article· fr· W2799291845 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Peter Clandfield

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhotography and Visual Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesAllusionArt historyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se basant sur les théories de Colin McArthur au sujet de la reconnaissance complexe des lieux cinématographiques par le spectateur, cet article examine la représentation du Pont de Québec dans le film Le confessionnal de Robert Lepage. Les images du pont qui marquent le début et la fin du film font allusion au Forth Bridge écossais du film 39 Steps, d'Hitchcock. Ces images sont aussi porteuses d'une symbolique qui évoque des moments précis de l'histoire du Québec et du Canada. Cette utilisation polyvalente du pont illustre les façons par lesquelles le cinéma dépeint le lieu canadien à la fois comme matériau historique et potentialité cinématographique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0160.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicPhotography and Visual CultureFrench-language works237,207