Multipath Cooperative Routing with Efficient Acknowledgement for LEO Satellite Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multipath routing can significantly improve the network throughput and end-to-end (e2e) delay. Network coding based multipath routing removes the complicated coordination among multiple paths so that it further enhances data transmission efficiency. Traditional network coding based multipath routing protocols, however, are inefficient for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite networks with the long link delay and regular network topology. Considering these characteristics, in this paper, we first formulate the multipath cooperative routing problem, then propose a Network Coding based Multipath Cooperative Routing (NCMCR) protocol for LEO satellite networks to improve the throughput. We propose source-based and destination-based multipath cooperative routing algorithms, which deliver different parts of a data flow along multiple link-disjoint paths dynamically and cooperatively. Furthermore, we design an efficient No-Stop-Wait ACK mechanism for our NCMCR protocol to accelerate the data transmission, where a source node continuously sends subsequent batches before it receives ACK messages for the batches sent previously. Under the proposed acknowledgement mechanism, we theoretically analyze the number of coded packets that should be sent and the transmission times of each batch for successfully decoding a batch. NS2-based simulation results demonstrate that our NCMCR outperforms the most related protocols.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".