Timing of gamma irradiation and blood donor sex influences in vitro characteristics of red blood cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are few studies investigating the effect of irradiation on red blood cells (RBCs) during storage. This study analyzed changes in in vitro quality of RBCs irradiated at several points during storage with the aim of providing evidence to support current maximum pre‐ and postirradiation storage limits. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Each of seven participating centers produced four pools of 7 standard RBC units (SAGM, AS‐3, or PAGGSM), which were then split back into 7 units. All units in a pool were from sex‐matched blood donors. Every week during 6 weeks of refrigerated storage, 1 unit was irradiated, while 1 unit was not irradiated (control). Units were tested weekly for biochemical variables, morphology, and mechanical fragility. RESULTS The earlier during storage that units were irradiated, the higher the hemolysis and K + at end of storage. Irrespective of the timing of irradiation, there was a rapid increase in extracellular K + , followed by a more gradual increase in hemolysis. ATP levels decreased faster in irradiated units and were reduced below accepted values if irradiated early. Irradiated female RBCs had an absolute lower hemolysis and K + level compared to male RBCs at all time points. CONCLUSIONS The method of blood component manufacturing determined the absolute levels of hemolysis and potassium in irradiated and nonirradiated units, but did not influence the effect that timing of irradiation had on the in vitro quality characteristics. This study provides support for the current Council of Europe guidelines on the time limitations for the irradiation of RBCs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".