Missed opportunities for prevention of vertical HIV transmission in Canada, 1997–2016: a surveillance study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vertical HIV transmission has declined in Canada, but missed opportunities for prevention continue to occur. We sought to determine the adequacy, and changes over time in adequacy, of uptake of maternal and neonatal antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of vertical HIV transmission, and to determine the vertical transmission rate over time and according to adequacy of antenatal antiretroviral therapy during the combination antiretroviral therapy era in Canada. METHODS: The Canadian Perinatal HIV Surveillance Program collects data annually through retrospective chart review concerning HIV-infected women and their infants. We determined receipt of adequate antiretroviral treatment (antenatal combination antiretroviral treatment for ≥ 4 wk, intrapartum intravenous zidovudine treatment and 4-6 wk of infant oral zidovudine treatment) and predictors of inadequate antenatal combination antiretroviral therapy (none or < 4 wk) in Canada in 1997-2016. RESULTS: < 0.001). During 2011-2016, 92 women (6.5%) received no or less than 4 weeks of antenatal combination antiretroviral therapy, 146 women (10.7%) received no intrapartum zidovudine treatment, and 43 infants (3.1%) received less than 4 weeks of zidovudine treatment. In multivariate analysis restricted to 2011-2016, higher uptake of adequate antenatal combination antiretroviral therapy was seen among black women than among Indigenous (odds ratio [OR] 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-7.26) or white (OR 1.87, 95% CI 0.99-1.27) women and in British Columbia/Yukon Territory than in Alberta (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.06-10.32), Ontario (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.08-9.26) or Quebec (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.09-10.84). Among the 14 vertical HIV transmission events during 2011-2016 (vertical transmission rate 1.0%), maternal HIV infection was diagnosed before the onset of labour in 5 cases, and only 2 women received adequate antenatal combination antiretroviral therapy. INTERPRETATION: Efforts to improve timely access to care, HIV screening and treatment for all women, combined with enhanced resources targeting populations at increased risk for HIV infection, will be needed if vertical HIV transmission is to be eliminated in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".