MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799345302

Force Estimation in Multiple Degrees of Freedom From Intramuscular Emg Via Muscle Synergies

2013· article· en· W2799345302 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCMBES Proceedings · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsometric exerciseElectromyographyForearmWristPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMuscle contractionComputer scienceMathematicsControl theory (sociology)MedicineAnatomyPhysical therapyArtificial intelligenceControl (management)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Force estimation is an important factor in proportional control of prosthetic arms. Muscle synergies seem to be relevant for force estimation since they are patterns of co- activations of muscles during actions. This study investigates the use of muscle synergies extracted from intramuscular electromyography (EMG) for estimating force during multiple degrees of freedom (DOF) voluntary contraction. For this purpose, muscle synergies of the contractions were extracted from six superficial forearm muscles from four able- bodied subjects. Also, the isometric force produced by the wrist during these contractions were recorded along multiple axes each responsible for one DOF. The neural inputs were then fed to an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to estimate the force. The results show a significant correlation between the estimated and measured force.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it