MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2799350718

Étude in vitro de la stabilité gastro-intestinale et de l'activité biologique de la microcine J25 : impact sur l'équilibre du microbiote colique et activité inhibitrice contre Salmonella enteritidis

2015· article· fr· W2799350718 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Emilie Reinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsSalmonella enteritidisSalmonellaChemistryMedicineMicrobiologyBiologyBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La microcine J25 (MccJ25), une bactériocine en forme de lasso synthétisée par Escherichia coli et ayant une activité inhibitrice contre Salmonella, a été produite et purifiée d’un surnageant d’E. coli pTUC202. La stabilité et l’activité biologique de cette bactériocine au niveau gastro-intestinal, ainsi que son impact sur l’équilibre du microbiote colique, ont été étudiés à l’aide d’un système de fermentation en continu avec cellules immobilisées reproduisant les conditions physiologiques et microbiologiques du côlon. L’analyse par qPCR du microbiote colique n’a révélé aucun effet significatif sur l’équilibre du microbiote de la MccJ25 lorsqu’elle est ajoutée à 0,4, 2 et 5 μM. Des tests d’activité antibactérienne ont démontré que la MccJ25 reste active contre Salmonella enteritidis dans les conditions coliques testées. Ces résultats suggèrent un fort potentiel d’utilisation de la MccJ25 comme alternative aux antibiotiques aussi bien chez l’animal que chez l’humain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCorpus Université Laval (Université Laval)→Same topicSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology→French-language works237,207→