MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799357830 · doi:10.12968/pnur.2018.29.5.223

Treating eczema in children in general practice

2018· article· en· W2799357830 on OpenAlexaff
Julie Van Onselen

Bibliographic record

VenuePractice Nursing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDermatology and Skin Diseases
Canadian institutionsLearning Partnership
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrimary careAsthmaAsthma managementFamily medicineDisease managementChronic diseasePediatricsDiseaseImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atopic eczema is very common and the vast majority of children are treated in primary care. Julie Van Onselen highlights the key role practice nurses can play in helping to manage eczema Atopic eczema is very common in children and the vast majority are treated in primary care. Atopic eczema management mirrors management of chronic asthma in primary care. Practice nurses are well placed to be ‘atopic nurses’ and assess, educate and treat children with atopic eczema, in a framework of chronic disease management, as they do in asthma management. This article gives information on assessment, the stepped approach to atopic eczema management, and discusses adherence and education of parents/carers, children and families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePractice NursingSame topicDermatology and Skin DiseasesFrench-language works237,207