MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799419430 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23243

Ultrasonic Based Device to Monitor Oil Separation from Oily Water Discharges

2018· article· en· W2799419430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMonteco (Canada)Western University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWestern UniversityOntario Centres of Excellence
KeywordsTransducerUltrasonic sensorFloat (project management)Environmental scienceFoulingEffluentReliability (semiconductor)Marine engineeringAcousticsProcess engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental engineeringPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Discharges of oily water are common among a number of commercial operations. If unregulated these effluents can lead to both short and long term adverse environmental impacts. Development efforts were undertaken in this study for a robust ultrasonic based device to monitor separation of oil and water from oily water effluents. Most of these separations are carried out in gravity settlers where several problems are encountered. These include periodic temperature variations (often over a 25–50 °C range), changes in composition of the oily phase, and presence of suspended impurities as well as fouling conditions. The device incorporates an innovative low cost self‐correction feature to minimize measurement errors under such difficult and dynamic conditions. This feature allows continuous in‐situ measurement of acoustic velocity, a key parameter required for oil depth measurements, giving accuracy within ±2 %. The development plans moved progressively from proof‐of‐concept to prototype of the device with a systematic strategy to improve reliability and accuracy at each stage. These included selection of appropriate transducer frequency and tests with suspended and settled impurities. After initial evaluations, a device configuration with a transducer mounted on a guided float was recommended for further development efforts. The transducer was placed facing down at the centre of the float designed to move up and down with the liquid level in the tank.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it