MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799464136 · doi:10.5206/uwomj.v86i1.2168

A focus on POCUS

2017· article· en· W2799464136 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alice Yi, Dino D'Andrea

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Western Ontario Medical Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensivistMedicineUltrasonographyIntensive careMedical educationSurgeryIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr Rob Arntfield is a trained emergency physician, intensivist, and traumatologist here at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC). Passionate about the use of ultrasonography and teaching, Dr Arntfield co-authored Point of Care Ultrasound1 (POCUS), which was published in 2014. A self-described London “townie”, he attended Western for medical school and continued in his hometown for a double emergency medicine and intensive care residency before pursuing a fellowship in New York City. We sat down with Dr Arntfield to discuss his work in critical care, trauma, and the rise of POCUS in trauma medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0080.016
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0090.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Western Ontario Medical JournalSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207