MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799496558 · doi:10.3968/10295

Analysis on the Influencing Factors of Transformation of Green Logistics Industry of Dangshan Pear Based on ISM

2018· article· en· W2799496558 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xuelei Wang, Jingping Feng, Zhonglin Zhou, Jiandong Xiang, Lurui Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPEARAgricultureProduction (economics)BusinessAdjacency matrixInterpretation (philosophy)Order (exchange)Computer scienceEnvironmental economicsRegional scienceGeographyEconomicsArchaeologyGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The state strongly advocates the construction of ecological civilization, which brings opportunities to the production and consumption of green products. The green stream of the development of the pear (sweet pear) is of great significance for the county in Suzhou city, Anhui province, which is a major economic crop. There are many disadvantages in the traditional pear logistics mode, and it is changing in the direction of green logistics. In this paper, the author USES the interpretation structure model (ISM) method to refine and analyze the factors affecting the development of green logistics of the pear, and summarizes the 12 influencing factors and their interrelationships through literature collection, data access and other methods, and establishes the Adjacency matrix and the Accessibility matrix, and constructs the Six-order interpretation structure model. Based on the analysis of the model, six suggestions are proposed to promote the development of green logistics transformation in Dangshan County, and provide references for the development of green agricultural logistics industry in Dangshan County and other areas in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicSustainable Supply Chain ManagementFrench-language works237,207