MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799500878 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.030

Data for the measurement of serum vitamin D metabolites in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors

2018· article· en· W2799500878 on OpenAlexaff
E. Delvin, Mélanie Boisvert, Marie-Pier Lecours, Yves Théorêt, Martin Kaufmann, Glenville Jones, Émile Lévy

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitamin D and neurologyLymphoblastic LeukemiaMedicineMass spectrometryBiomarkerChildhood leukemiaLeukemiaChemistryChromatographyPhysiologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes data related to a companion research paper entitled “Vitamin D nutritional status and bone turnover biomarkers in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (cALL) survivors.” (Delvin et al., submitted for publication) [1]. Various methods for the measurement of serum 25OHD3, the accepted biomarker for assessing vitamin D nutritional status, have been described (Le Goff et al., 2015; Jensen et al., 2016) [2], [3]. This article describes a novel mass spectrometry-QTOF method for the quantification of circulating 25OHD3, 3-epi-25OHD3 and 24,25(OH)2D3. It provides the description of the extraction, chromatography and mass spectrometry protocols, a sample of mass spectra obtained from standards and extracted serum, and a comparison with another HPLC-MS/MS (Jensen et al., 2016) [3] method for the measurement of serum concentrations of 25OHD3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207