AN ALGEBRAIC FORMULATION AND EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF TWO CIRCULAR-ARC CAMS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we introduce the kinematic analysts of two circular-arc cams with profile design and experimental validation. In particular, an algorithm is proposed in terms of geometrical parameters and the cam profile, mainly for design purposes. Numerical examples are reported to prove the soundness of the proposed algorithm. Displacement, velocity and acceleration diagrams are obtained for the synthesized cam profile by means of equivalent slider-crank mechanisms, in order to derive a simple procedure for testing cam profiles with a low-cost test-bed. An experimental test-bed has been set up at the Laboratory of Robotics and Mechatronics in Cassino in order to validate the kinematic characteristics of the two circular-arc profiles so that the experimental results can be used also to test the profile quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it