MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799520777 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2013-0036

FUZZY LOGIC-BASED INTELLIGENT CONTROL FOR SVM SPEAKER VERIFICATION WITH THE SUPPORT OF GMM PRIOR INFORMATION

2013· article· en· W2799520777 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ing-Jr Ding, Chih-Ta Yen, Zih-Jheng Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupport vector machineComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFuzzy logicRobustness (evolution)Pattern recognition (psychology)Mixture modelClassifier (UML)Speaker verificationSpeaker recognitionMachine learningSpeech recognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a fuzzy logic-based intelligent control (FLIC) scheme for support vector machine (SVM) speaker verification, called FLICSVM, is developed. The proposed FLICSVM method enhances SVM training by considering the property of training utterances for establishing the SVM model and therefore could further ensure the robustness of the SVM classifier on speaker verification. In FLICSVM, when establishing the SVM model in the training procedure, the popular fuzzy control methodology is employed to tune certain specific SVM parameter according to the prior information of SVM training utterances that is derived from Gaussian mixture model (GMM) calculations. Experimental results demonstrated that proposed FLICSVM is apparently superior to conventional SVM in the recognition accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207