MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799521149 · doi:10.1097/btf.0000000000000197

Revision of Synthetic Cartilage Implant Hemiarthroplasty of the Great Toe to Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: Technique and Indications

2018· article· en· W2799521149 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mark B. Davies, Veronica I. Roberts, Carolyn Chadwick, Mark Glazebrook

Bibliographic record

VenueTechniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineArthrodesisImplantSurgeryOsteoarthritisArthroplasty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of a polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint has increased since publication of the results of a pivotal, prospective, randomized, multicenter, noninferiority, clinical trial performed in the United Kingdom and Canada. The synthetic cartilage implant was awarded FDA approval in July 2016, permitting its commercial distribution in the United States, which has led to a notable escalation in its use. Concomitant failures in a small proportion of these patients will require conversion to arthrodesis. This study describes the surgical technique used to convert synthetic cartilage implant hemiarthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint to arthrodesis and the 3 cases that underwent revision at a single center in the United Kingdom. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level IV, case series. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechniques in Foot & Ankle SurgerySame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207