MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799528072 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2017-1016

DEVELOPMENT AND OPTIMIZATION OF A LINEAR-MOTOR-DRIVEN WATER HYDRAULIC PISTON PUMP

2017· article· en· W2799528072 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Huang Ye-qing, Hui Ji, Shuang Nie

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiston pumpAxial piston pumpPiston (optics)Radial piston pumpHydraulic motorVolumetric flow rateSuctionValve timingVariable displacement pumpStiffnessFlow (mathematics)MechanicsMechanical engineeringControl theory (sociology)Plunger pumpEngineeringHydraulic pumpMaterials scienceComputer scienceStructural engineeringPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research develops a new piston pump driven by four double-action linear motors (abbr. FDLMP). The working principle of FDLMP is introduced, and the theoretical models of flow rates, effects of motion planning, and hysteresis of flat valve on pulsation ratio of combination flow rate of the piston pump are investigated systematically. The simulation and test results showed that the key design parameters such as the clearance of piston sector, spring preloading and stiffness of suction valve play important roles in the improvement of volumetric efficiency and flow pulsation rate of FDLMP. These research works lay the foundation for the further development of FDLMP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207