MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799553016 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2011-0030

LENGTH-OPTIMIZED SMOOTH OBSTACLE AVOIDANCE FOR ROBOTIC MANIPULATORS

2011· article· en· W2799553016 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Soheil S. Parsa, Juan A. Carretero, Roger Boudreau

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MonctonUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsObstacle avoidanceAccelerationControl theory (sociology)ObstaclePath (computing)Displacement (psychology)Motion planningComputer scienceTrajectoryCollision avoidanceMathematicsRobotMobile robotArtificial intelligenceCollisionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel optimized smooth obstacle avoidance algorithm for robotic manipulators. First, a 3-4-5 interpolating polynomial is used to plan a smooth trajectory between initial and final positions in the joint space without considering any obstacles. Then, a simple harmonic function, which is smooth and continuous in displacement, velocity and acceleration, is applied to generate a new smooth path avoiding collisions between the robot links and an obstacle. The obstacle avoidance portions on the path are optimized such that the length of the path traversed by the end-effector is minimized. Simulation results for a 6 DOF serial manipulator demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207