Genotypic, phylogenetic and epidemiological characteristics of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus strains (PRRSV) in Vietnam
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nucleotide sequence of ORF5 encoding the antigenic GP5 for 11 strains collected from different geographic localities in the country during 2008-2011 were obtained. These nucleotide sequences were analyzed for molecular properties (nucleotides and amino acids) to determine genotype, phylogenetic and molecular epidemiological characteristics compared with PRRSV circulating in Vietnam and worldwide. Analysis of nucleotides and deduced amino acids showed that there was very high level of nucleotide identity and amino acid homology (98 – 100%) between the Vietnamese and Chinese PRRSV strains. Phylogenetic analysis based on ORF5 nucleotide sequences revealed two large groups, one derived from the North American lineage of genotype 2, including 11 PRRSV isolates in this study and another of the European lineage of genotype 1. In the genotype 2, further subgroups were found among which there were strains of Asia (Vietnam, China, India), strains of the European/North American origin (Austria, US, Denmark) and a 2012-isolated strain from Canada, in a separate subgroup. Regarding to the epidemiological analysis, our isolates collected during 2008-2011, completely followed the endemic peaks occurred in Viet Nam, such as those in 2007-2008 and in 2010-2011. They all were determined as highly virulent strains due to high homology to the highly virulent strains of China occurred in those periods. We have some conclusions to be made that the outbreaks of highly pathogenic PRRSV in Vietnam were epidemiologically associated with the endemics occurred in China and originated from China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".