MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799576157 · doi:10.1002/mop.31231

A novel dual band‐notch ultra‐wideband monopole antenna using parasitic stubs and slot

2018· article· en· W2799576157 on OpenAlexaff
F. Guichi, Mouloud Challal, Tayeb A. Denidni

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonopole antennaOmnidirectional antennaAntenna (radio)Multi-band deviceGround planePatch antennaWiMAXJ-pole antennaElectrical engineeringFeed lineRadiation patternPhysicsAcousticsCoaxial antennaEngineeringTelecommunicationsWireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents a novel ultra‐wideband (UWB) monopole antenna with dual band‐notch characteristics. The proposed antenna consists of a V‐shaped patch with a stair case defect fed by a 50 Ω transmission line and a semicircular defected ground plane. It is designed for rejection of dual frequency bands, that is, WiMAX (3.17–3.85 GHz) and ITU (7.9–9.1 GHz). The 2 bands are achieved by using 2 parasitic stubs that are inserted on the patch, and an inverted U‐shaped slot that is etched on the transmission line, respectively. The antenna has a nearly omnidirectional radiation pattern with an acceptable gain across the operating frequency band. A good agreement between the simulated and measured results indicates that the proposed UWB antenna design with overall size of 23 × 32 mm2 is suitable for WiMAX/ITU dual band‐notch applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207