Efficient blind source extraction of noisy mixture utilising a class of parallel linear predictor filters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a novel blind source extraction of a noisy mixture using a class of parallel linear predictor filters. Analysis of a noisy mixture equation is carried out to address new autoregressive source signal model based on the covariance matrix of the whitened data. A method of interchanging the rules of filter inputs is proposed such that this matrix becomes the filter input while the estimated source signals are considered as the parallel filter coefficients. As the matrix has unity norm and unity eigenvalues, the filter becomes independent on the mixture signal norm and eigenvalues variations, thus solving drastically the ambiguity due to the dependency of the filter on the mixture power levels if the mixture is considered as the filter input. Furthermore, the unity eigenvalues of the matrix result in a very fast convergence in two iterations. Simulation results show that the model is capable of extracting the unknown source signals and removing noise when the input signal‐to‐noise ratio is varied from −20 to 80 dB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it