MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799633727 · doi:10.15353/acmla.n158.219

Books Reviewed by: Carina Xue Luo, Rhys Stevens and Siobhan Hanratty

2018· article· en· W2799633727 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sarah Simpkin

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin - Association of Canadian Map Libraries and Archives (ACMLA) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkbookArt historyCartographyArtMedia studiesHistoryGeographySociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ballas, Dimitris, Graham Clarke, Rachel S. Franklin, and Andy Newing. GIS and the Social Sciences: Theory and Applications. First edition. New York: Routledge, 2018. 280p. $59.95 USD. ISBN 978-1-138-78512-0. Bodenstein, Wulf. Exploring Africa with Ancient Maps. Tervuren, Belgium: Royal Museum for Central Africa, 2017. 296p. 19,50 €. ISBN 978-9-4922-4479-6.Gorr, Wilpen L, and Kristen S. Kurland. GIS Tutorial 1 for ArcGIS Pro: A Platform Workbook. Redlands, CA: Esri Press, 2017. 480p. 99.99 USD. ISBN Print: 9781589484665 ISBN Digital: 9781589484931.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2900.275

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin - Association of Canadian Map Libraries and Archives (ACMLA)Same topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207