L’effacement de la sociologie le playsienne au profit de la sociologie « doctrinale »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Même parmi les milieux canadiens les plus cléricaux, les études leplaysiennes ont joui d’une certaine audience et d’une certaine popularité au tournant du xxe siècle. Puis, au fur et à mesure où l’on avance dans le siècle, cette forme de sociologie s’est effacée du paysage intellectuel canadien français. Alors que la doctrine de Le Play pouvait séduire un conservateur ou un nationaliste canadien français, les désaccords avec ses disciples dissidents de l’École de la science sociale, Edmond Demolins et Henri de Tourville, furent beaucoup plus nombreux. C’est donc dans un déplacement des fondements épistémo-politiques de la pratique sociologique, et non seulement dans des circonstances périphériques à la science sociale elle-même, qu’il faut trouver les motifs d’un désintérêt collectif qui entraina, à terme, la marginalisation à peu près complète de l’œuvre de Le Play au Canada français de l’entre-deux-guerres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.045 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".