Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose de comparer les usages de l’intime dans le voyage en Californie d’Arthur Buies et dans les reportages de Gabrielle Roy sur l’Ouest canadien. Il existe une filiation très forte entre le récit de voyage journalistique et le grand reportage. Les voyageurs et les reporters comme Buies et Roy mettent en scène un « je » autobiographique dont la force est d’établir une forme d’intimisme en contrepoint du mouvement des transports, des impondérables du territoire et des rencontres avec des étrangers. Avec le développement des médias de masse, le reporter se distingue toutefois radicalement du voyageur dans son rapport à l’altérité. Roy tente de réduire la distance entre le lecteur et ses interlocuteurs, alors que Buies s’isole des étrangers pour rester au plus près du lectorat. Porteuse des traces d’une transformation historique, leur comparaison éclaire la reconfiguration du rapport entre le journaliste, le lectorat et les figures d’altérité au tournant du siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".