MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2799683212 · doi:10.1002/jbmr.3454

Sclerostin Neutralizing Antibody Treatment Enhances Bone Formation but Does Not Rescue Mechanically Induced Delayed Healing

2018· article· en· W2799683212 on OpenAlexafffund
Bettina Kruck, Elizabeth A. Zimmermann, Sophie Damerow, Christine Figge, Catherine Julien, Dag Wulsten, Tobias Thiele, Madge Martin, Reggie C. Hamdy, Marie K. Reumann, Georg N. Duda, Sara Checa, Bettina M. Willie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bone and Mineral Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone fractures and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityShriners Hospitals for Children - CanadaMontreal Children's Hospital
FundersRéseau de Recherche en Santé Buccodentaire et OsseuseShriners Hospitals for Children
KeywordsSclerostinNeutralizing antibodyBone healingMedicineAntibodyEndocrinologyImmunologyBiologySurgeryCell biologySignal transductionWnt signaling pathway

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During bone healing, tissue formation processes are governed by mechanical strain. Sost/sclerostin, a key Wnt signaling inhibitor and mechano-sensitive pathway, is downregulated in response to mechanical loading. Sclerostin neutralizing antibody (SclAb) increases bone formation. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether sclerostin inhibition can rescue bone healing in situations of mechanical instability, which otherwise delay healing. We investigated SclAb's influence on tissue formation in a mouse femoral osteotomy, stabilized with rigid or semirigid external fixation. The different fixations allowed different magnitudes of interfragmentary movement during weight bearing, thereby influencing healing outcome. SclAb or vehicle (veh) was administeredand bone healing was assessed at multiple time points up to day 21 postoperatively by in vivo micro-computed tomography, histomorphometry, biomechanical testing, immunohistochemistry, and gene expression. Our results show that SclAb treatment caused a greater bone volume than veh. However, SclAb could not overcome the characteristic delayed healing of semirigid fixation. Indeed, semirigid fixation resulted in delayed healing with a prolonged endochondral ossification phase characterized by increased cartilage, lower bone volume fraction, and less bony bridging across the osteotomy gap than rigid fixation. In a control setting, SclAb negatively affected later stages of healing under rigid fixation, evidenced by the high degree of endosteal bridging at 21 days in the rigid-SclAb group compared with rigid-veh, indicating delayed fracture callus remodeling and bone marrow reconstitution. Under rigid fixation, Sost and sclerostin expression at the gene and protein level, respectively, were increased in SclAb compared with veh-treated bones, suggesting a negative feedback mechanism. Our results suggest that SclAb could be used to enhance overall bone mass but should be carefully considered in bone healing. SclAb may help to increase bone formation early in the healing process but not during advanced stages of fracture callus remodeling and not to overcome delayed healing in semirigid fixation. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bone and Mineral ResearchSame topicBone fractures and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207